jump to navigation

DBD isn’t a Panacea September 13, 2008

Posted by Jim Satterfield in Energy, Technology.
trackback

The chant rang loudly at the Republican National Convention. Drill, baby, drill. Whether accurate or not, the impression is given when you turn an idea into a repetitious chant that it is your only answer. Be careful when you do that. But here is a decent article from Scientific American taking a look at the issue.

The article notes that much of the discussion is based on old data from surveys done with older, less accurate equipment and there is no motivation for expensive surveys with newer equipment in areas where drilling is currently banned. There is no motivation in their opinion for either the government or private industry to do these kind of surveys. But it occurs to me that in fact doing just that would be a great thing for the government to do. If we are currently working off of old (or even non-existent) data there would be few things better for the government to do than to find an old survey location, run a new one and compare the two. Just one wouldn’t do it, of course but how many of these tests would be a good baseline for comparison of the old systems with the new could be determined by a panel of experts from government, industry and academia.

Advertisements

Comments»

No comments yet — be the first.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: